There are some differences between the way that R, SAS, SPSS, and Stata represented labelled data and missing values. While SAS, SPSS, and Stata share some obvious similarities, R is little different. This vignette explores the differences, and shows you how haven bridges the gap.

## Value labels

Base R has one data type that effectively maintains a mapping between integers and character labels: the factor. This however, is not the primary use of factors: they are instead designed to automatically generate useful contrasts for linear models. Factors differ from the labelled values provided by the other tools in important ways:

SPSS and SAS can label numeric and character values, not just integer values.

The value do not need to be exhaustive. It is common to label the special missing values (e.g.

`.D`

= did not respond,`.N`

= not applicable), while leaving other values as is.

Value labels in SAS are a little different again. In SAS, labels are
just special case of general formats. Formats include currencies and
dates, but user-defined just assigns labels to individual values
(including special missings value). Formats have names and existing
independently of the variables they are associated with. You create a
named format with `PROC FORMAT`

and then associated with
variables in a `DATA`

step (the names of character formats
thealways start with `$`

).

###
`labelled()`

To allow you to import labelled vectors into R, haven provides the S3
labelled class, created with `labelled()`

. This class allows
you to associated arbitrary labels with numeric or character
vectors:

```
x1 <- labelled(
sample(1:5),
c(Good = 1, Bad = 5)
)
x1
#> <labelled<integer>[5]>
#> [1] 4 3 5 1 2
#>
#> Labels:
#> value label
#> 1 Good
#> 5 Bad
x2 <- labelled(
c("M", "F", "F", "F", "M"),
c(Male = "M", Female = "F")
)
x2
#> <labelled<character>[5]>
#> [1] M F F F M
#>
#> Labels:
#> value label
#> M Male
#> F Female
```

The goal of haven is not to provide a labelled vector that you can use everywhere in your analysis. The goal is to provide an intermediate datastructure that you can convert into a regular R data frame. You can do this by either converting to a factor or stripping the labels:

```
as_factor(x1)
#> [1] 4 3 Bad Good 2
#> Levels: Good 2 3 4 Bad
zap_labels(x1)
#> [1] 4 3 5 1 2
as_factor(x2)
#> [1] Male Female Female Female Male
#> Levels: Female Male
zap_labels(x2)
#> [1] "M" "F" "F" "F" "M"
```

See the documentation for `as_factor()`

for more options
to control exactly what the factor uses for levels.

Both `as_factor()`

and `zap_labels()`

have data
frame methods if you want to apply the same strategy to every column in
a data frame:

```
df <- tibble::data_frame(x1, x2, z = 1:5)
#> Warning: `data_frame()` was deprecated in tibble 1.1.0.
#> ℹ Please use `tibble()` instead.
df
#> # A tibble: 5 × 3
#> x1 x2 z
#> <int+lbl> <chr+lbl> <int>
#> 1 4 M [Male] 1
#> 2 3 F [Female] 2
#> 3 5 [Bad] F [Female] 3
#> 4 1 [Good] F [Female] 4
#> 5 2 M [Male] 5
zap_labels(df)
#> # A tibble: 5 × 3
#> x1 x2 z
#> <int> <chr> <int>
#> 1 4 M 1
#> 2 3 F 2
#> 3 5 F 3
#> 4 1 F 4
#> 5 2 M 5
as_factor(df)
#> # A tibble: 5 × 3
#> x1 x2 z
#> <fct> <fct> <int>
#> 1 4 Male 1
#> 2 3 Female 2
#> 3 Bad Female 3
#> 4 Good Female 4
#> 5 2 Male 5
```

## Missing values

All three tools provide a global “system missing value” which is
displayed as `.`

. This is roughly equivalent to R’s
`NA`

, although neither Stata nor SAS propagate missingness in
numeric comparisons: SAS treats the missing value as the smallest
possible number (i.e. `-inf`

), and Stata treats it as the
largest possible number (i.e. `inf`

).

Each tool also provides a mechanism for recording multiple types of missingness:

Stata has “extended” missing values,

`.A`

through`.Z`

.SAS has “special” missing values,

`.A`

through`.Z`

plus`._`

.SPSS has per-column “user” missing values. Each column can declare up to three distinct values or a range of values (plus one distinct value) that should be treated as missing.

Stata and SAS only support tagged missing values for numeric columns. SPSS supports up to three distinct values for character columns. Generally, operations involving a user-missing type return a system missing value.

Haven models these missing values in two different ways:

For SAS and Stata, haven provides “tagged” missing values which extend R’s regular

`NA`

to add a single character label.For SPSS, haven provides a subclass of

`labelled`

that also provides user defined values and ranges.

### Tagged missing values

To support Stata’s extended and SAS’s special missing value, haven implements a tagged NA. It does this by taking advantage of the internal structure of a floating point NA. That allows these values to behave identical to NA in regular R operations, while still preserving the value of the tag.

The R interface for creating with tagged NAs is a little clunky
because generally they’ll be created by haven for you. But you can
create your own with `tagged_na()`

:

Note these tagged NAs behave identically to regular NAs, even when
printing. To see their tags, use `print_tagged_na()`

:

```
print_tagged_na(x)
#> [1] 1 2 3 NA(a) NA(z) 3 2 1
```

To test if a value is a tagged NA, use `is_tagged_na()`

,
and to extract the value of the tag, use `na_tag()`

:

```
is_tagged_na(x)
#> [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE
is_tagged_na(x, "a")
#> [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE
na_tag(x)
#> [1] NA NA NA "a" "z" NA NA NA
```

My expectation is that tagged missings are most often used in
conjuction with labels (described below), so labelled vectors print the
tags for you, and `as_factor()`

knows how to relabel:

### User defined missing values

SPSS’s user-defined values work differently to SAS and Stata. Each
column can have either up to three distinct values that are considered
as missing, or a range. Haven provides `labelled_spss()`

as a
subclass of `labelled()`

to model these additional
user-defined missings.

```
x1 <- labelled_spss(c(1:10, 99), c(Missing = 99), na_value = 99)
x2 <- labelled_spss(c(1:10, 99), c(Missing = 99), na_range = c(90, Inf))
x1
#> <labelled_spss<double>[11]>
#> [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
#> Missing values: 99
#>
#> Labels:
#> value label
#> 99 Missing
x2
#> <labelled_spss<double>[11]>
#> [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
#> Missing range: [90, Inf]
#>
#> Labels:
#> value label
#> 99 Missing
```

These objects are somewhat dangerous to work with in R because most R functions don’t know those values are missing:

```
mean(x1)
#> [1] 14
```

Because of that danger, the default behaviour of
`read_spss()`

is to return regular labelled objects where
user-defined missing values have been converted to `NA`

s. To
get `read_spss()`

to return `labelled_spss()`

objects, you’ll need to set `user_na = TRUE`

.

I’ve defined an `is.na()`

method so you can find them
yourself:

```
is.na(x1)
#> [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE
```

And the presence of that method does mean many functions with an
`na.rm`

argument will work correctly:

```
mean(x1, na.rm = TRUE)
#> [1] 14
```

But generally you should either convert to a factor, convert to regular missing vaues, or strip the all the labels:

```
as_factor(x1)
#> [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
#> [9] 9 10 Missing
#> Levels: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Missing
zap_missing(x1)
#> [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NA
#> attr(,"labels")
#> Missing
#> 99
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "haven_labelled"
zap_labels(x1)
#> [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NA
```